After the flush: Touring high-tech treatment plant (May 22, 2008)
By Renee Worthing
Register Reporter
Sanford Sewerage District trustees opened the doors of the high-tech upgraded wastewater treatment facility to the public on May 16.
District Trustees Paul Demers, Keith Patterson, and Chief Operator Andre Brousseau guided guests over metal catwalks spanning gargantuan cement vats of wastewater, through buildings where wastewater is progressively cleaned and disinfected and finally released to a grassy area where the clean water spills into the Mousam River.
Founded in 1947 by a special act of the Legislature, the sewer department began providing wastewater treatment for commercial, industrial and residential needs in Sanford and Springvale.
However, Sewerage District employee Stephen Doiron said high levels of phosphorous caused algae blooms in Estes Lake.
When state and federal regulatory agencies directed the district to upgrade the level of wastewater being discharged into the Mousam River, the Sanford Sewerage District examined wastewater disposal alternatives and developed an advanced treatment and disposal process to meet the requirements established by the regulatory agencies, including the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
In June 2003, Phase 1 of the facility upgrade began. By August 2005, the improved treatment plant was operational.
Phase 2 broke ground in 2006 and was completed in January, at a total cost of about $20.5 million.
The Sanford Sewerage District funded the project with assistance from a Maine Department of Environmental Protection $300,000 grant.
Sewage is now treated in three stages, Doiron said.
The facility uses several treatment processes, including aeration, chemical treatment for the removal of phosphorus, filtration for suspended solids removal and disinfection by ultraviolet light.
It can treat up to 4.9 million gallons of wastewater per day, removing more than 95 percent of suspended solids and more than 90 percent of the phosphorus. After the treated water is disinfected with ultraviolet light, which causes damage to the genetic structure of bacteria, the water is discharged into the Mousam River.
Because no chemicals are used in the final disinfection stage of the water, the water has no adverse effect on people, fish, animals or plants, Doiron said.
Solids, also called sludge, are neutralized and disposed of on site, a practice Doiron said is very unusual, but saves the town money.
“If we didn’t dispose of it here, it would have to be trucked out,” he said.
Demers said the upgraded facility is also good for economic development because the new facility can handle much more wastewater than before.
“If an industrial company that uses a lot of water wants to come in to town, we can now handle them,” Demers said.
To contact Renee Worthing, email news@intheregister.com or 282-4337 ext. 240
Register Reporter
Sanford Sewerage District trustees opened the doors of the high-tech upgraded wastewater treatment facility to the public on May 16.
District Trustees Paul Demers, Keith Patterson, and Chief Operator Andre Brousseau guided guests over metal catwalks spanning gargantuan cement vats of wastewater, through buildings where wastewater is progressively cleaned and disinfected and finally released to a grassy area where the clean water spills into the Mousam River.
Founded in 1947 by a special act of the Legislature, the sewer department began providing wastewater treatment for commercial, industrial and residential needs in Sanford and Springvale.
However, Sewerage District employee Stephen Doiron said high levels of phosphorous caused algae blooms in Estes Lake.
When state and federal regulatory agencies directed the district to upgrade the level of wastewater being discharged into the Mousam River, the Sanford Sewerage District examined wastewater disposal alternatives and developed an advanced treatment and disposal process to meet the requirements established by the regulatory agencies, including the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
In June 2003, Phase 1 of the facility upgrade began. By August 2005, the improved treatment plant was operational.
Phase 2 broke ground in 2006 and was completed in January, at a total cost of about $20.5 million.
The Sanford Sewerage District funded the project with assistance from a Maine Department of Environmental Protection $300,000 grant.
Sewage is now treated in three stages, Doiron said.
The facility uses several treatment processes, including aeration, chemical treatment for the removal of phosphorus, filtration for suspended solids removal and disinfection by ultraviolet light.
It can treat up to 4.9 million gallons of wastewater per day, removing more than 95 percent of suspended solids and more than 90 percent of the phosphorus. After the treated water is disinfected with ultraviolet light, which causes damage to the genetic structure of bacteria, the water is discharged into the Mousam River.
Because no chemicals are used in the final disinfection stage of the water, the water has no adverse effect on people, fish, animals or plants, Doiron said.
Solids, also called sludge, are neutralized and disposed of on site, a practice Doiron said is very unusual, but saves the town money.
“If we didn’t dispose of it here, it would have to be trucked out,” he said.
Demers said the upgraded facility is also good for economic development because the new facility can handle much more wastewater than before.
“If an industrial company that uses a lot of water wants to come in to town, we can now handle them,” Demers said.
To contact Renee Worthing, email news@intheregister.com or 282-4337 ext. 240






Since this great "Grand Opening", and since the Sewer Dept. started isolating the sewer lines from the storm drains, I have had sewerage back up into my bathtub on 2 occasions, one being this morning. After complaining about it to the Sewerage District they responded they were in no way at fault (they figured this out in less than 30 minutes from the initial call- amazing!) and that any sewerage in my pipes is MY PROBLEM (no matter where it came from). This after raising my sewer bill 400 %. Have they been taking lessons from Brenda Harvey at DHHS? Is there a competition for most incompetant govt. service in Maine?
Reply to this
Since this great "Grand Opening", and since the Sewer Dept. started isolating the sewer lines from the storm drains, I have had sewerage back up into my bathtub on 2 occasions, one being this morning. After complaining about it to the Sewerage District they responded they were in no way at fault (they figured this out in less than 30 minutes from the initial call- amazing!) and that any sewerage in my pipes is MY PROBLEM (no matter where it came from). This after raising my sewer bill 400 %. Have they been taking lessons from Brenda Harvey at DHHS? Is there a competition for most incompetant govt. service in Maine?
Reply to this
I guess you couldn't add my previous post because it was antithetical to your rosy, warm-fuzzy, eniviro-friendly, happy story about the Sanford Sewerage District. I am not warm and fuzzy. My sewer bill went from $70/quarter to $240/quarter and since the increase in price, I have had sewerage back up into my bathtub twice. I have lived in the same house with the same plumbing system for 4 years and never had a problem. Now that the sewerage district is tearing up the roads and installing new pipes I have had sewer in my bathtub twice. Somehow this is my fault (according to the sewer dept.), although I have not significantly changed my water/sewer usage in FOUR YEARS! I am now looking for some way to sanction the Sanford Sewerage District through a Class Action Suit or some other means. Other people in my neighborhood have had sewerage back up into their house (even flooding their basement- I guess that was their fault, too!), all the while the Sewerage Dept. claims no responsibility. If The Register feels it needs to ignore this story and cover it up, that's fine - there are other media outlets available and it will reflect poorly on The Register in the end. After all, we wouldn't want to make waves and hold "Government Agencies" responsible for their action (or inactions) would we?
Reply to this